← To Part 2

Philippine Catholicism spread with Spanish colonization in the 16th century and shaped not only faith but also the structure of towns, education, views of the family, and political consciousness. Its influence, however, varied by region and did not uniformly cover Muslim or indigenous societies.

During the colonial period, a resettlement policy gathering residents around churches was carried out. Towns centered on a church and plaza served both as bases for evangelization and as foundations of colonial rule. Through baptism, marriage, and funerals, the Church came to administer the milestones of life, and priests held great authority in local communities.

Yet the faith was not transplanted one-sidedly. Veneration of the Virgin Mary and patron saints, festivals, and pilgrimages became tied to local customs and wishes. The fiesta affirmed faith and also provided an occasion for relatives and residents to gather and renew their ties through shared meals and donations. Godparenthood at baptism and other occasions also supported mutual aid beyond blood relations. At the same time, such relationships can deepen dependence on powerful people.

In education, religious orders founded schools and contributed to training intellectuals and professionals. The University of Santo Tomas, founded in 1611, is a representative example. There were, however, colonial inequalities within the Church as well, and conflict between Spanish friars and Filipino priests became one factor that fostered national consciousness.

In family ethics, the Church emphasized the permanence of marriage, respect for life, and the responsibilities of parents and children. While this became a norm supporting families, the Church’s opposition to artificial contraception also led to conflicts over population policy and women’s self-determination. Still, the actual lives of believers and their opinions on policy do not always coincide with the Church’s official views.

Its relationship with politics is also two-sided. The Church supported the colonial order, yet it also became a force that criticized power and protected citizens. In the EDSA upheaval of 1986, Cardinal Sin called on citizens by radio and encouraged a nonviolent gathering.

From Weber’s perspective, its distinguishing feature is that the Church’s rituals and organization entered deeply into everyday life and supported the solidarity and authority of communities. Philippine poverty and economic development, however, cannot be explained by religion alone. Religion has acted on society in combination with the land system, political structures, education, employment, and other factors.

← To Part 2

← To Part 1

The Social Influence of Each Religion

Weber compared how religions influenced people’s labor, economic activity, attitudes toward authority, and the discipline of everyday life. What follows is a summary of his view. It does not describe each religion as a whole or its believers today, but indicates the historical features he emphasized.

1. Protestantism: Vocational Labor and the Discipline of Life

What Weber especially emphasized was the ascetic Protestantism of the Calvinists and others.
It gave worldly occupations the meaning of a “calling,” a mission given by God.
Working diligently became not only a means of earning a living but also a religious duty.
Under the Calvinist doctrine of predestination, those to be saved are determined in advance by God.
Humans cannot change that decision through good works, and they grow anxious about their own salvation.
In actual religious life, disciplined labor became a means of supporting confidence in salvation.
This, however, was not a simple doctrine that becoming rich brings salvation.
An attitude developed of avoiding wasted time, idleness, and luxury and managing the whole of life in a planned way.
Because pleasure-seeking consumption is restrained even when work yields profit, saving and reinvestment advance more readily.
He argued that this attitude toward life contributed to forming the spirit that supports modern capitalism.
He did not attribute the same effect to all Protestants, including Lutherans.
Once capitalism is established, competition forces people into disciplined labor even as religious motives fade.

2. Catholicism: Salvation Through the Church and Monastic Asceticism

Weber emphasized the system in Catholicism by which the Church and clergy mediate salvation.
Believers can face sin and salvation through the sacraments, confession, and absolution.
Compared with ascetic Protestants, individuals bear the anxiety of salvation alone to a lesser degree.
In monasteries, on the other hand, a life strictly regulating time, labor, and prayer developed.
Weber found there an important precedent for the rationalization that systematically disciplines life.
Yet high asceticism was demanded mainly of religious specialists such as monks.
This differs from a system organizing the occupational life of all ordinary believers with the same strictness.
The Church embraced both a religiously thoroughgoing minority and the majority leading everyday lives.
As a trans-regional organization, it also influenced education, law, and political power.
The Church and secular authorities sometimes cooperated and sometimes clashed over the legitimacy of rule.
He did not argue that commerce or capitalism was absent from the Catholic world.
The focus of the comparison is the difference in where asceticism is located in society and how it reaches the lives of ordinary believers.

3. Confucianism: Cultivated Officials and Adaptation to the Existing Order

Weber understood Confucianism as an ethic carried by China’s bureaucratic intellectual stratum.
The ideal is a person who has acquired learning and propriety and handles human relationships appropriately.
The civil service examinations and classical education opened the way to officialdom and spread common values.
Political rule required the virtue of the ruler and the ability to maintain order.
Filial piety and ancestor worship strengthened the bonds of family and kin.
Economic activity, too, was influenced by such personal relationships and obligations.
Confucianism does not reject wealth or worldly success in themselves.
However, a person of broad cultivation is esteemed above a specialist merchant pursuing profit alone.
Rather than transforming the world for the sake of religious salvation, it seeks to adapt harmoniously to the order of this world.
Weber contrasted this attitude with Protestant inner-worldly asceticism.
This is not an explanation that China lacked diligence or commercial ability.
He considered that the combination of Confucian ethics, bureaucracy, kinship institutions, and so on led to a development different from that of Western Europe.

4. Hinduism: Status Order and Religious Duty

Weber emphasized the link between Hinduism and the caste order.
Social position, occupation, marriage, diet, and more are regulated by a religious status order.
The ritual distinction between purity and impurity serves to maintain boundaries between groups.
The ideas of karma and rebirth explain one’s present circumstances by linking them to past deeds.
People hold hope for a future life by fulfilling the duties appropriate to their status.
He therefore argued that this had the effect of giving religious meaning to worldly inequality.
This does not mean, however, that all believers shared the same ideas.
Even when the economic activity of merchants and artisans is vigorous, the norms of each status direct their behavior.
Duties differing by group tend to be valued over a work ethic common to society as a whole.
Those who pursue religious salvation thoroughly, on the other hand, may withdraw from worldly life.
World-renouncing asceticism coexists with everyday life carried on within the status order.
Weber considered that this structure produced a direction different from Western-style economic rationalization.

5. Buddhism: Liberation from Suffering and Distance from the World

What Weber mainly discussed was early Buddhism and the path of salvation through monastic renunciation.
The aim is to overcome the suffering of life and the desires and attachments that cause it.
Wealth, power, and social success do not guarantee ultimate salvation.
Practitioners seek liberation from the cycle of rebirth through meditation and self-control.
Inner transformation of the self is valued over actively mastering others or the world.
Its direction therefore differs from an ethic that treats vocational labor thoroughly as a sacred mission.
The practice of monastics requires the support of lay believers, such as through almsgiving.
Here a relationship forms between those who pursue salvation as specialists and those who carry on everyday life.
For lay believers, almsgiving and the observance of precepts become an important part of religious life.
From this structure, Weber considered how Buddhism positions economic activity.
His argument, however, cannot be applied to all of Mahayana Buddhism or Japanese Buddhism.
Buddhism has historically had diverse developments deeply involved in politics, commerce, and local society.

6. Ancient Judaism: Prophetic Ethics and Responsibility to History

Weber regarded ancient Judaism as an important element leading to Western religious rationalization.
God is held to be not one with the cycles of nature but a transcendent being who gives commands to the world.
Humans have the responsibility to follow the covenant with God and to act righteously.
Prophets interpreted calamity and defeat not as mere bad luck but in relation to faith and conduct.
History thus came to be understood as having ethical meaning and direction.
Not only the correct performance of ritual but also justice and care for the weak are called into question.
Even rulers and the wealthy become subject to criticism by God’s demands.
This prophetic ethic differs from an attitude that unconditionally affirms existing power.
Law and religious education also supported the continuity of the community and the discipline of life.
Weber also discussed the economic activity of later Jews in relation to exclusion and legal restrictions.
He did not, however, identify it with the spirit of modern capitalism.
His account also includes terms and historical understandings that should be reexamined today.

7. Islam: The Union of Religion and Political Community

Regarding Islam, Weber focused on the union of religious mission with a political and military community.
Faith does not remain within the individual’s inner life but concerns law, government, and the order of the community.
For its early development, he emphasized the attitudes toward life and sense of honor of the warrior stratum.
He also examined the influence on social life of religious law and of the scholars who interpret it.
As for the system of government, he discussed its relation to patrimonial rule.
He took up how such forms of rule and law affect the predictability of economic activity.
On the other hand, he did not think that commercial activity was uniformly rejected by religion.
His interest lay in the difference from the work ethic of ascetic Protestantism.
However, he did not complete an independent comparative study of Islam.
His discussion is fragmentary and generalizes more strongly than for other religions.
It does not adequately address mysticism, urban merchant culture, or the diversity of regional institutions.
It must therefore be read as Weber’s hypothesis and distinguished from an explanation of Islamic society as a whole.

The question running through all of this is that the way people work, use wealth, and relate to power changes according to what they regard as sacred duty. Religion alone does not determine society, however; it is important to see it as an interaction with the economy, political institutions, and social strata. (Continued in Part 3, on the influence of Catholicism on Philippine society)

Weber’s sociology of religion explores how religion influences human ways of life, economic activity, and social order. The works known in Japanese as “The Sociology of Religion” include translations of part of “Economy and Society.” This summary centers on that systematic discussion while also touching on his comparative studies of the world religions.

What Weber asks is not whether God exists or which religion is correct. He asks how people act because they believe in religious meanings. Rituals that look irrational from the outside are, for those who perform them, meaningful acts for avoiding illness and disaster and protecting their lives. To understand religion, it is necessary to grasp the motives of believers themselves and to consider the consequences their actions bring to society.

Early religious and magical acts did not necessarily aim at salvation after death. They were closely tied to this-worldly benefits such as good harvests, health, long life, and victory in war. Magicians tried to manipulate spiritual forces through special abilities, and people sought to ward off misfortune through rituals and offerings. In time, the characters and roles of the gods were put in order, and religious ideas developed into more systematic images of the world. This, however, is not a simple theory of development in which all religions advance in the same sequence.

In the formation and transformation of religion, differences among those who carry it are important. Priests administer ritual and doctrine on the basis of continuing organizations and traditions. Prophets, by contrast, set forth new teachings and ways of life on the authority of a revelation or mission they have received. Weber distinguishes ethical prophecy, which demands obedience to God’s commands, from exemplary prophecy, which shows the way to salvation through the prophet’s own way of life. When a prophet’s personal authority is institutionalized by successors and religious communities, the teachings become an order of everyday life.

Believers are not uniform either. Peasants, warriors, bureaucrats, merchants, artisans, intellectuals, and others each have different living conditions and religious needs. For peasants, rituals tied to nature and the land can be meaningful; for warriors, ideas affirming honor and fate. For merchants and artisans, a calculable order and an ethic regulating everyday conduct may be congenial. But a particular stratum does not necessarily hold a particular faith. The carriers of a religion and its doctrines change while influencing each other.

When religion becomes systematized, the question arises: “Why do the good suffer and the wicked prosper?” If the world follows a just order, how are real misfortune and injustice to be explained? This is the problem of theodicy. Religions offer different answers, such as rewards in the afterlife, the idea of karma linking past deeds and rebirth, and the inscrutable decrees of God. These answers give meaning to suffering and at the same time direct how people live in this world.

The meaning of salvation also differs from religion to religion. The conduct required changes according to what one is to be saved from, whether calamity, sin, the cycle of rebirth, desire, or the meaninglessness of life. Participation in ritual, good works, faith, meditation, and ascetic practice become paths to salvation. To understand the social influence of religion, one must look not only at the names of doctrines but also at what believers actually do every day to attain salvation.

To compare such attitudes toward life, Weber distinguishes asceticism from mysticism. In asceticism, a person acts as God’s instrument, suppressing desires and practicing disciplined conduct. In mysticism, one seeks union with the divine through contemplation and inner experience rather than action. Further differences arise according to whether one withdraws from the world or remains within it. These are ideal types for sorting out actual religions; in reality, several features are mixed together.

Inner-worldly asceticism is a representative combination of these. Without withdrawing from society, one disciplines oneself within one’s occupation and family life. Weber argued that in ascetic Protestantism this attitude supported labor, thrift, credit, and continuous reinvestment. Religion did not, however, determine the economy unilaterally. What he examines is the historical process in which economic conditions and institutions became linked with religious motives.

In comparing the world religions, he takes up Confucianism in China, Hinduism and Buddhism in India, ancient Judaism, and others. He found in Confucianism an adaptation to the order of this world; in the religions of India, a status order and salvation from the cycle of rebirth; and in ancient Judaism, an ethical prophecy linking God’s commands with history. The purpose of the comparison is not to rank religions but to clarify why different attitudes toward life took shape in each civilization.

The more thoroughly a religious ethic is carried through, the stronger its tension with actual society becomes. Universal brotherly love collides with the impersonal competition of the market and with the violence of the state and war. Art, eroticism, and scholarship also develop their own values and move away from the demands of religion. Rationalization does not simply mean science dispelling superstition; it also means that conflicts among different values become clear in the process of trying to systematize life.

What Weber’s sociology of religion shows is that religion is not merely an escape from reality but has the power to organize human action and change society. At the same time, actions based on faith produce results that believers did not intend. The core of this research is to elucidate the relationship between the meanings people give to the world and the institutions their actions create. (Continued in Part 2 on the social influence of each religion as analyzed by Weber →)

To Part 2 →